Examining the controversial claims Trump is making at his midterm rallies

President Donald Trump has been making several controversial claims at his midterm rallies, drawing attention from critics and fact-checkers alike. White House correspondent Liz Landers has been examining these claims, and her findings have shed light on some of the most contentious statements.

At a recent rally in Pennsylvania, Trump claimed that the 2020 presidential election was "stolen" from him, despite numerous investigations and court rulings that have found no evidence of widespread voter fraud. Landers notes that Trump's claim is based on a false narrative that has been perpetuated by some of his supporters, but has been thoroughly debunked by fact-checkers and election officials.

Trump has also made claims about the economy, stating that the country is experiencing a "recession" and that his policies have been responsible for the growth. However, data from reputable sources such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Congressional Budget Office show that the economy is actually experiencing a period of slow growth, and that the recession is not as severe as Trump claims.

Furthermore, Trump has made several claims about immigration, stating that the country is "overpopulated" and that his policies have been successful in reducing the number of immigrants. However, data from the Pew Research Center and the US Census Bureau show that the country's population is actually growing, and that immigration has been a significant contributor to that growth.

Landers also notes that Trump's claims about the environment are often based on misinformation and exaggeration. For example, he has claimed that the Paris Agreement is a "bad deal" for the country, despite the fact that the agreement has been widely praised by scientists and experts for its potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

In addition to these claims, Trump has also made several claims about his own accomplishments, stating that he has achieved more than any other president in history. However, this claim is based on a false narrative that has been perpetuated by some of his supporters, and has been thoroughly debunked by fact-checkers and historians.