How the 2028 Primaries Could Cripple America’s AI Buildout

The 2028 US presidential primaries are approaching, and with them, a potential threat to the country's artificial intelligence (AI) development. Some Democratic governors are using the upcoming elections to one-up each other with costly regulations that could hinder the growth of AI in the United States.

Several governors, including those from California, New York, and Massachusetts, have proposed or introduced legislation aimed at regulating AI development. These regulations include measures to limit the use of AI in certain industries, such as healthcare and finance, and to impose stricter data protection requirements.

One of the most notable examples is California Governor Gavin Newsom's proposal to ban the use of facial recognition technology in the state. Newsom has argued that the technology poses a significant threat to civil liberties and that it should be banned nationwide.

However, his proposal has been met with resistance from some lawmakers and industry groups, who argue that it is too broad and would stifle innovation. New York Governor Kathy Hochul has also proposed a similar ban on facial recognition technology, but with some key differences.

Her proposal would only apply to law enforcement agencies, rather than private companies. However, some critics argue that this would not be enough to prevent the widespread use of facial recognition technology.

Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey has taken a more nuanced approach, proposing a framework for regulating AI development that would prioritize transparency and accountability. Her proposal would require companies to disclose the use of AI in their products and services, and would establish a regulatory body to oversee the development of AI.

The potential impact of these regulations on the US AI industry is significant. Some experts argue that the regulations could drive companies to develop AI in other countries with more favorable regulatory environments.

Others argue that the regulations could lead to a more cautious approach to AI development, which could ultimately benefit the country in the long run. The 2028 primaries could have a significant impact on the US AI industry, and it will be interesting to see how the candidates respond to the issue.

Will they take a hardline stance against AI regulation, or will they propose more nuanced solutions? Only time will tell.